Loading ...Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out
Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out
Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own.
Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in theUK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.
Gun-ban list proposed.
by Alan Korwin
Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress). It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady’s plan to introduce shortly. I have an outline of the Brady’s current plans and targets of opportunity. It’s horrific. They’re going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They’ve made little mention of criminals. Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process, confiscated property, states’ rights, free speech, right to assemble and more, in addition to the Second Amendment. The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):
Rifles (or copies or duplicates):
M1 Carbine,
Sturm Ruger Mini-14,
AR-15,
Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15,
AR-10,
Thompson 1927,
Thompson M1;
AK,
AKM,
AKS,
AK-47,
AK-74,
ARM,
MAK90,
NHM 90,
NHM 91,
SA 85,
SA 93,
VEPR;
Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70,
Calico Liberty,
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU,
Fabrique National FN/FAL,
FN/LAR, or FNC,
Hi-Point20Carbine,
HK-91,
HK-93,
HK-94,
HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando,
Kel-Tec Sub Rifle;
Saiga,
SAR-8,
SAR-4800,
SKS with detachable magazine,
SLG 95,
SLR 95 or 96,
Steyr AU,
Tavor,
Uzi,
Galil and Uzi Sporter,
Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).
Pistols (or copies or duplicates):
Calico M-110,
MAC-10,
MAC-11, or MPA3,
Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9,
TEC-DC9,
TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10,
Uzi.
Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG,
SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
Striker 12,
Streetsweeper.
Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):
A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.
Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rim fire rifles)…
A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has:
(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.
Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will: Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any “semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General.”
Note that Obama’s pick for this office, Eric Holder, wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a working firearm in your own home. In making this determination, the bill says, “there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the
United States military or any law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.” In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.
The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn’t have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose — is that devious or what? And of course, “sporting purpose” is a rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.
More from this category
- Fort Hood shooting reveals shortcomings of institutionalized political correctness
- America continues to fight back
- Gun owners cheer at Corzine ouster, overlook Bloomberg’s 3rd term
- Predictably, gun banners plan to exploit murder of Seattle police officer
More from this author
- Fort Hood shooting reveals shortcomings of institutionalized political correctness
- Introspection, Not Rationalization, Needed in Wake of Fort Hood Slaughter
- Zelaya Aide Says Honduran Agreement Has Failed
- Thailand-Cambodia Tensions Rise Over Appointment of Fugitive Thai Official
Subscribe to this author
Thank You, all of you “new era, ” Kennedy Democrats. Because of “you,” we are now subjects of a socialistic President, and a majority of
Democratic House and Senate. You have also allowed the spectre of “Slick Willie,” to reassent itself into your gun cabinet, and your personal freedoms. Enjoy living on your knees.
The problem with this gun ban list is that it does not take into account the fact that people use guns for more than just sport. I have a shotgun that I keep for home protection. Several of my friends carry pistols for their own personal protection. A pistol right back in the face of a carjacker is the best way to keep yourself from being taken advantage of by a thug. If more and more guns are going to be banned, the government takes away the tools to defend ourselves. The cops are always there when you’re speeding, but never there fast enough when you need them. I’ll trust my own judgement, thank you very much.
Maybe I haven’t done the research properly but have they noticed that states that let you have guns seem to be safer than states that ban them.
I live back in California after living in Arizona for ten years and I can attest to that. I believe thieves think twice before entering a home or business unlawfully because a majority of people that live in AZ owm a firearm and are ready to use them if they have to. A few years ago, AZ starting issuing concealed weapons permits to those willing to aytend a two day concealed weapons class. Alot of people I met and knew there looked after each other and respected one another. In other words, AZ was a safe place to be. I heard a story once of a would be thug that walked into a bar and tried to hold up the joint. He ended up being shot 10 times by ten different people and lived. It was a humorous story but accounts like that are known to have happened.
Somehow this got messed up in the posting. This is NOT “Obama’s Gun Ban List.” This is the Democrat’s list from the last session of Congress (the 110th) when they had no control or ability to pass the thing — it’s just an indication of how they’re thinking and what they’d like to do.
I did NOT write this part, and the headline is misleading:
–
“Obama’s Gun Ban List Is Out:
Here it is, folks, and it is bad news. The framework for legislation is always laid, and the Democrats have the votes to pass anything they want to impose upon us. They really do not believe you need anything more than a brick to defend your home and family. Look at the list and see how many you own.
Remember, it is registration, then confiscation. It has happened in theUK, in Australia, in Europe, in China, and what they have found is that for some reason the criminals do not turn in their weapons, but will know that you did.
Remember, the first step in establishing a dictatorship is to disarm the citizens.
–
To see my original posting, and to get them yourself directly, go to http://www.gunlaws.com; this item is under the New Stuff button.
Alan Korwin.
It’s about more than just taking away our ability to defend ourselves against thugs. The true purpose of the destruction of the 2nd Amendment is so that we have no ability to defend our liberties. Remember, of all the rights guaranteed us by the Bill of Rights, the 2nd Amendment is the one that guarantees that the Government will not try and undo the other 9.
But in the last century, we’ve slowly morphed from a free and largely armed society to a disarmed populace psychologically conditioned to fear all guns while at the same time ever more dependent on Government for our needs. This attempt to make illegal all guns not suitable for small-game subsistence hunting is occurring at the same time that we have a one-party government short-circuiting the rule of law at every opportunity and using the economic crisis as an excuse to curtail even more freedoms and seize more assets.
Scary times ahead.
AS SOON AS THE PRESIDENT DISARMS HIS SECRET SERVICE. I’LL TURN IN MY FIREARMS. ANYTHING THE PRESIDENT NEEDS, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE NEED.
hi
This is same firearms ban in Cook County Illinois. nothing new for the people of Cook County Illinois.
thats funny, the department of justice say fewer that 7% of gun crimes are committed by assault rifles! Most are handguns!!